Eichhorn does not appear to have named Q as such, but this part of his hypothesis fits what has come to be called Q.
See Kümmel 77–79. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
In this post:
 |
Hone Your Craft as a Biblical Scholar
Eichhorn does not appear to have named Q as such, but this part of his hypothesis fits what has come to be called Q.
See Kümmel 77–79. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
In this post:
|