Payne on Vaticanus’s Distigmai

Today, Philip Payne concludes his critique of Peter Head’s contention that the distigmai in Vaticanus “mark[] textual variation” and “belong to one unified system that was added some time in the 16th century.” To read the series in five parts, click below.

A composite PDF is forthcoming, as is Head’s revised argument that incorporates Payne’s critiques.

Some of the links above may be “affiliate links.” If you make a purchase or sign up for a service through one of these links, I may receive a small commission from the seller. This process involves no additional cost to you and helps defray the costs of making content like this available. For more information, please see these affiliate disclosures.

One response to “Payne on Vaticanus’s Distigmai”

  1. David Stark Avatar

    Payne’s response is now available in PDF at Evangelical Textual Criticism via

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.