Today, Philip Payne concludes his critique of Peter Head’s contention that the distigmai in Vaticanus “mark[] textual variation” and “belong to one unified system that was added some time in the 16th century.” To read the series in five parts, click below.
- Part 1: Introduction
- Part 2: Diple
- Part 3: Small Numbers, Large Numbers, and Other Marginalia
- Part 4: De Sepulveda
- Part 5: Identifying Later Distigmai and Conclusion
A composite PDF is forthcoming, as is Head’s revised argument that incorporates Payne’s critiques.
Payne’s response is now available in PDF at Evangelical Textual Criticism via Box.net