Peter Gurry reflects on an article by Federico Marchetti and the problems of studying scribal habits via work on singular readings.
Gurry particularly extracts Marchetti’s comments on the danger of inadvertently imputing to subsequent scribes errors that have accumulated at different prior points in the history of transmission.
For Gurry’s full commentary on the article, see his original post.
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of any other person(s) or institution(s).
Disclosure of Material Connection: Some of the links in the content above may be “affiliate links.” I only recommend products or services I genuinely believe will add value to you as a reader. But if you click one of these links and purchase the item, I will receive an affiliate commission from the seller at no additional cost to you. Consequently, I am disclosing this affiliate status in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.”