See Kümmel 149–51. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
In this post:
![]() |
Hone Your Craft as a Biblical Scholar
See Kümmel 149–51. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
In this post:
![]() |
See Baird 305; Kümmel 148–49. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
![]() ![]() |
See Kümmel 146–48. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
In this post:
![]() |
Herder thought that Mark most exactly reproduced UrevOr. Matthew reproduced it with expansions, and Luke, aware of these expansions, “wished to create ‘an actual historical account’ after a wholly Hellenistic pattern.” Herder also hypothesized that “[s]ome forty years later John . . . wrote an ‘echo of the earlier Gospels at a higher pitch’ which undertook to set forth Jesus as the Savior of the world. . . .”
See Kümmel 79–83. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
In this post:
Eichhorn does not appear to have named Q as such, but this part of his hypothesis fits what has come to be called Q.
See Kümmel 77–79. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
In this post:
![]() |
See Kümmel 76. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
In this post:
![]() |