In the (e)mail: Rodríguez and Thiessen, “The So-called Jew”

Cover image for In addition to Boccaccini and Segovia’s Paul the Jew, inbox recently saw the arrival from Fortress Press of a review copy of Rafael Rodríguez and Matthew Thiessen’s edited volume The So-Called Jew in Paul’s Letter to the Romans (2016). According to the book’s blurb:

Decades ago, Werner G. Kümmel described the historical problem of Romans as its “double character”: concerned with issues of Torah and the destiny of Israel, the letter is explicitly addressed not to Jews but to Gentiles. At stake in the numerous answers given to that question is nothing less than the purpose of Paul’s most important letter. In The So-Called Jew in Paul’s Letter to the Romans, nine Pauline scholars focus their attention on the rhetoric of diatribe and characterization in the opening chapters of the letter, asking what Paul means by the “so-called Jew” in Romans 2 and where else in the letter’s argumentation that figure appears or is implied. Each component of Paul’s argument is closely examined with particular attention to the theological problems that arise in each.

I’m looking forward to working through the text and reviewing it for the Stone-Campbell Journal.

I recently also had the privilege of reviewing Rafael’s prior If You Call Yourself a Jew: Reappraising Paul’s Letter to the Romans (Wipf & Stock, 2014). I very much appreciate the argument that Rafael brings out in that volume. Rafael has very kindly received the review, though he rightly notes some lingering questions that tend to make me lean in a bit different direction. But, I’m definitely looking forward to seeing what in the new Fortress volume may speak to those or other related matters. As H.-G. Gadamer reflects,

We say we “conduct” a conversation, but the more genuine a conversation is, the less its conduct lies within the will of either partner. Thus a genuine conversation is never the one that we wanted to conduct. Rather, it is generally more correct to say that we fall into conversation, or even that we become involved in it. The way one word follows another, with the conversation taking its own twists and reaching its own conclusion, may well be conducted in some way, but the partners conversing are far less leaders of it than the led. (Truth and Method, 401; underlining added)

Journal of Biblical Literature 132, no. 2

The Journal of Biblical Literature 132, no. 2 includes:

  • C. L. Seow, “An Exquisitely Poetic Introduction to the Psalter”
  • Mark Leuchter, “Genesis 38 in Social and Historical Perspective”
  • Brian C. Dennert, “Hanukkah and the Testimony of Jesus’ Works (John 10:22–39)”
  • Joshua Berman, “Histories Twice Told: Deuteronomy 1–3 and the Hittite Treaty Prologue Tradition”
  • Jeremy Schipper, “Interpreting the Lamb Imagery in Isaiah 53”
  • Alicia D. Myers, “‘Jesus Said to Them…’: The Adaptation of Juridical Rhetoric in John 5:19-47”
  • Alexander E. Stewart, “Narrative World, Rhetorical Logic, and the Voice of the Author in 4 Ezra
  • Matthew Thiessen, “Revisiting the πρoσηλυτoς in ‘the LXX'”
  • Thomas R. Blanton, “Saved by Obedience: Matthew 1:21 in Light of Jesus’ Teaching on the Torah”
  • Yitzhaq Feder, “The Aniconic Tradition, Deuteronomy 4, and the Politics of Israelite Identity”
  • Eric D. Reymond, “The Meanings of ‘Life’ in the Hebrew of Ben Sira”
  • Michael Bartos; Bernard M. Levinson, “‘This Is the Manner of the Remission’: Implicit Legal Exegesis in 11QMelchizedek as a Response to the Formation of the Torah”
  • Amy Erickson, “‘Without My Flesh I Will See God’: Job’s Rhetoric of the Body”
  • Troy W. Martin, “Περβoλαιoν as ‘Testicle’ in 1 Corinthians 11:15: A Response to Mark Goodacre”